Vote Republican. Cling to your God and Guns.

24 September 2005

No S***, There I Was...

We had just performed a jump, moving from one tactical area to another. We has secured the area, and our area had a great overwatch position of the Armored Cavalry Squadron that we supported.

I had set up my copt and my other gear and was just getting ready to sit down and eat an MRE (probably a Menu #4, Corned Beef Hash (with Tobasco Sauce), when It Happened.

We heard a series of small booms, three or four of them. We got up and looked down into the area where the tanks were, and saw the smoke of the artillery attack. Immediately we jumped, grabbed our gear and ran to our helicopter. The pilots were going to perform an abbreviated takeoff procedure: battery on, flip a few more switches, then we hear the pilots yell, "CLEAR," to let us know the Auxiliary Power Unit was starting and to get out of the way of the exhaust - flame has been known to blow out during an APU start. So they yell and flip the APU START switch, so these gifted pilots of Army Aviation can get this bird out of the area and save my sorry ass.




The crew chief, Wes, immediately jumps on the top of the helicopter, and using his handy dandy screwdriver, rips off the APU housing and starts making adjustments.

In the meantime, I am taking a cover position to make sure nothing is coming at me or my crewmates. In the distance, I see an BRDM reconnaissance vehicle on the move, with the gunner shooting all kinds of people . I yell to Wes, "Whatever you do, oyu bett hurry!! I got a BRDM moving toward us!"

Wes, in the meantime, is furiously re-attaching fuel lines and other stuff. He yells to the pilots, "Try it now!"



At this point the BRDM is about 30 meters away. I begin firing at the BRDM Gunner, hoping to get a lucky kill so they might not approach us any closer. Again I yell at them to hurry up. When I look back, Wes the Crew Chief is jumping up and down on the top of helicopter, screaming at the tops of his lung a 45 second stream of obscenities that would make the Sergeant Major of any unit proud.

At this point, the BRDM stops about 1o meters away and the gunner rips a three-second burst from his RPK light machine gun.

The Observer-controller gets out of his Hummer (the original one) and tells us all that we are dead, and to lie down for about 20 minutes, then drives away.

So, I stand up, go over to my helicopter, and ask Wes what happened that made me get shot by this stupid Russky soldier.

"The APU died." Gonna take three days to get a new one."

"Shit," says I, "I wanted to really get some flying done this trip, too"

Such was the experience of my first foray into combat at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin. I got shot because my helicopter broke.

So, I went back, ate my Corned Beef Hash and took a nap. Screw laying down and playing dead.

14 September 2005

I Forgot!!!

My brother is in a movie! The film, called Fugitive Hunter, is an indie film about the lives of Bounty hunters. It is fast-paced and action packed. My brother plays Neil Swift (great name fora Bounty Hunter, if you ask me), the owner of a Bounty Hunter agency.

I totally recommend it. Good movie for an independent film!!

11 September 2005


This 4th anniversary of the attacks by Wahabist extremists still has troops overseas and families torn apart.

Never forget. Ever.

God Bless America.

10 September 2005

Let New Orleans burn?

I have one question for hte Bush haters:

If everything about bush is oil, then why would he let the largest port in the United States, and THE 4TH LARGEST DEEP WATER PORT IN THE WORLD just go belly up?

Think about that. New Orleans is one, if not the main, port for exports and imports into this country. It is getting to be the harvest of wheat, which is transported by barge down the mighty Mississipi to New Orleans and then shipped over seas. With nobody living in New Orleans, then the port (which was minimally damaged) what happens to all those goods?

I received this in an email from Strategic Forecasting. Beware, it is a little long, but very educational.

"New Orleans: A Geopolitical Prize

By George Friedman

The American political system was founded in Philadelphia, but the American nation was built on the vast farmlands that stretch from the Alleghenies to the Rockies. That farmland produced the wealth that funded American industrialization: It permitted the formation of a class of small landholders who, amazingly, could produce more than they could consume. They could sell their excess crops in the east and in Europe and save that money, which eventually became the founding capital of American industry.

But it was not the extraordinary land nor the farmers and ranchers who alone set the process in motion. Rather, it was geography -- the extraordinary system of rivers that flowed through the Midwest and allowed them to ship their surplus to the rest of the world. All of the rivers flowed into one -- the Mississippi -- and the Mississippi flowed to the ports in and around one city: New Orleans. It was in New Orleans that the barges from upstream were unloaded and their cargos stored, sold and reloaded on ocean-going vessels. Until last Sunday, New Orleans was, in many ways, the pivot of the American economy.

For that reason, the Battle of New Orleans in January 1815 was a key moment in American history. Even though the battle occurred after the War of 1812 was over, had the British taken New Orleans, we suspect they wouldn't have given it back. Without New Orleans, the entire Louisiana Purchase would have been valueless to the United States. Or, to state it more precisely, the British would control the region because, at the end of the day, the value of the Purchase was the land and the rivers - which all converged on the Mississippi and the ultimate port of New Orleans. The hero of the battle was Andrew Jackson, and when he became president, his obsession with Texas had much to do with keeping the Mexicans away from New Orleans.

During the Cold War, a macabre topic of discussion among bored graduate students who studied such things was this: If the Soviets could destroy one city with a large nuclear device, which would it be? The usual answers were Washington or New York. For me, the answer was simple: New Orleans. If the Mississippi River was shut to traffic, then the foundations of the economy would be shattered. The industrial minerals needed in the factories wouldn't come in, and the agricultural wealth wouldn't flow out. Alternative routes really weren't available. The Germans knew it too: A U-boat campaign occurred near the mouth of the Mississippi during World War II. Both the Germans and Stratfor have stood with Andy Jackson: New Orleans was the prize.

Last Sunday, nature took out New Orleans almost as surely as a nuclear strike. Hurricane Katrina's geopolitical effect was not, in many ways, distinguishable from a mushroom cloud. The key exit from North America was closed. The petrochemical industry, which has become an added value to the region since Jackson's days, was at risk. The navigability of the Mississippi south of New Orleans was a question mark. New Orleans as a city and as a port complex had ceased to exist, and it was not clear that it could recover.

The Ports of South Louisiana and New Orleans, which run north and south of the city, are as important today as at any point during the history of the republic. On its own merit, POSL is the largest port in the United States by tonnage and the fifth-largest in the world. It exports more than 52 million tons a year, of which more than half are agricultural products -- corn, soybeans and so on. A large proportion of U.S. agriculture flows out of the port. Almost as much cargo, nearly 17 million tons, comes in through the port -- including not only crude oil, but chemicals and fertilizers, coal, concrete and so on.

A simple way to think about the New Orleans port complex is that it is where the bulk commodities of agriculture go out to the world and the bulk commodities of industrialism come in. The commodity chain of the global food industry starts here, as does that of American industrialism. If these facilities are gone, more than the price of goods shifts: The very physical structure of the global economy would have to be reshaped. Consider the impact to the U.S. auto industry if steel doesn't come up the river, or the effect on global food supplies if U.S. corn and soybeans don't get to the markets.

The problem is that there are no good shipping alternatives. River transport is cheap, and most of the commodities we are discussing have low value-to-weight ratios. The U.S. transport system was built on the assumption that these commodities would travel to and from New Orleans by barge, where they would be loaded on ships or offloaded. Apart from port capacity elsewhere in the United States, there aren't enough trucks or rail cars to handle the long-distance hauling of these enormous quantities -- assuming for the moment that the economics could be managed, which they can't be.

The focus in the media has been on the oil industry in Louisiana and Mississippi. This is not a trivial question, but in a certain sense, it is dwarfed by the shipping issue. First, Louisiana is the source of about 15 percent of U.S.-produced petroleum, much of it from the Gulf. The local refineries are critical to American infrastructure. Were all of these facilities to be lost, the effect on the price of oil worldwide would be extraordinarily painful. If the river itself became unnavigable or if the ports are no longer functioning, however, the impact to the wider economy would be significantly more severe. In a sense, there is more flexibility in oil than in the physical transport of these other commodities.

There is clearly good news as information comes in. By all accounts, the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, which services supertankers in the Gulf, is intact. Port Fourchon, which is the center of extraction operations in the Gulf, has sustained damage but is recoverable. The status of the oil platforms is unclear and it is not known what the underwater systems look like, but on the surface, the damage - though not trivial -- is manageable.

The news on the river is also far better than would have been expected on Sunday. The river has not changed its course. No major levees containing the river have burst. The Mississippi apparently has not silted up to such an extent that massive dredging would be required to render it navigable. Even the port facilities, although apparently damaged in many places and destroyed in few, are still there. The river, as transport corridor, has not been lost.

What has been lost is the city of New Orleans and many of the residential suburban areas around it. The population has fled, leaving behind a relatively small number of people in desperate straits. Some are dead, others are dying, and the magnitude of the situation dwarfs the resources required to ameliorate their condition. But it is not the population that is trapped in New Orleans that is of geopolitical significance: It is the population that has left and has nowhere to return to.

The oil fields, pipelines and ports required a skilled workforce in order to operate. That workforce requires homes. They require stores to buy food and other supplies. Hospitals and doctors. Schools for their children. In other words, in order to operate the facilities critical to the United States, you need a workforce to do it -- and that workforce is gone. Unlike in other disasters, that workforce cannot return to the region because they have no place to live. New Orleans is gone, and the metropolitan area surrounding New Orleans is either gone or so badly damaged that it will not be inhabitable for a long time.

It is possible to jury-rig around this problem for a short time. But the fact is that those who have left the area have gone to live with relatives and friends. Those who had the ability to leave also had networks of relationships and resources to manage their exile. But those resources are not infinite -- and as it becomes apparent that these people will not be returning to New Orleans any time soon, they will be enrolling their children in new schools, finding new jobs, finding new accommodations. If they have any insurance money coming, they will collect it. If they have none, then -- whatever emotional connections they may have to their home -- their economic connection to it has been severed. In a very short time, these people will be making decisions that will start to reshape population and workforce patterns in the region.

A city is a complex and ongoing process - one that requires physical infrastructure to support the people who live in it and people to operate that physical infrastructure. We don't simply mean power plants or sewage treatment facilities, although they are critical. Someone has to be able to sell a bottle of milk or a new shirt. Someone has to be able to repair a car or do surgery. And the people who do those things, along with the infrastructure that supports them, are gone -- and they are not coming back anytime soon.

It is in this sense, then, that it seems almost as if a nuclear weapon went off in New Orleans. The people mostly have fled rather than died, but they are gone. Not all of the facilities are destroyed, but most are. It appears to us that New Orleans and its environs have passed the point of recoverability. The area can recover, to be sure, but only with the commitment of massive resources from outside -- and those resources would always be at risk to another Katrina.

The displacement of population is the crisis that New Orleans faces. It is also a national crisis, because the largest port in the United States cannot function without a city around it. The physical and business processes of a port cannot occur in a ghost town, and right now, that is what New Orleans is. It is not about the facilities, and it is not about the oil. It is about the loss of a city's population and the paralysis of the largest port in the United States.

Let's go back to the beginning. The United States historically has depended on the Mississippi and its tributaries for transport. Barges navigate the river. Ships go on the ocean. The barges must offload to the ships and vice versa. There must be a facility to empower this exchange. It is also the facility where goods are stored in transit. Without this port, the river can't be used. Protecting that port has been, from the time of the Louisiana Purchase, a fundamental national security issue for the United States.

Katrina has taken out the port -- not by destroying the facilities, but by rendering the area uninhabited and potentially uninhabitable. That means that even if the Mississippi remains navigable, the absence of a port near the mouth of the river makes the Mississippi enormously less useful than it was. For these reasons, the United States has lost not only its biggest port complex, but also the utility of its river transport system -- the foundation of the entire American transport system. There are some substitutes, but none with sufficient capacity to solve the problem.

It follows from this that the port will have to be revived and, one would assume, the city as well. The ports around New Orleans are located as far north as they can be and still be accessed by ocean-going vessels. The need for ships to be able to pass each other in the waterways, which narrow to the north, adds to the problem. Besides, the Highway 190 bridge in Baton Rouge blocks the river going north. New Orleans is where it is for a reason: The United States needs a city right there.

New Orleans is not optional for the United States' commercial infrastructure. It is a terrible place for a city to be located, but exactly the place where a city must exist. With that as a given, a city will return there because the alternatives are too devastating. The harvest is coming, and that means that the port will have to be opened soon. As in Iraq, premiums will be paid to people prepared to endure the hardships of working in New Orleans. But in the end, the city will return because it has to.

Geopolitics is the stuff of permanent geographical realities and the way they interact with political life. Geopolitics created New Orleans. Geopolitics caused American presidents to obsess over its safety. And geopolitics will force the city's resurrection, even if it is in the worst imaginable place. "

Now: Do you honestly think that bushitler would sacrifice a city with such importance as New Orleans to just piss away?


09 September 2005

So much for the 2nd and 4th Amendments...

I guess the Superintendent of the NOLA PD has decided to impose tyrannical rule, by disarming everybody in N'Awlins.

Quote: "
No one is allowed to be armed. We're going to take all the guns."

-P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police.

I have read this over at both Kim duToit's and Geek with a .45's sites. I am sure that the rest of the Blogosphere will be on it, as well. I hope that Hugh Hewitt and others more powerful get on this, and I sure as shit hope someone sues them over this. I am also sure that the ACLU wouldn't want to help out. Bastards.

I spoke to my dad about this, and though he mentioned that he would hate to see them try to take MY weapons (I cannot stand the term 'gun"), he also mentioned that I am not stupid enough to hang around if a situation presented itself where I live.

Thanks, Dad.

Oh ,and to the powers that be:

Molon labe

If you do not know what that means, visit the link. And learn.

UPDATE: Smoke on the water opines

As does Chris the Anarchamgel here. GO read therem as well the updates at the end.

It appears that a line has been crossed, and there are some pretty pissed off about it.

As I said, Molon Labe, baby

07 September 2005

Gun Control BAD?

LeatherneckM31 hit the nail on the head!!

If you are against gun control in any way after seeing the results in N'Awlins, you have my pity and sympathy.

The government has no responsibility for your safety. Period.

Only. You. Do.

If you do not own a weapon, buy one. If you do, practice. Often. And resupply your ammo.

I down several, and no, you cannot have mine. Not until I am done with them, anyway.

06 September 2005

My brother

My older brother has a post here. He and I take a lot of test online, and we score in a similar range, but, God love him, he has some wacked out views.

Go read him; he has some good stuff.


Bill Whittle - Go. Now

If you have not read him, I recommend that you read Bill Whittle. You will not be disappointed.

It takes a few minutes, but it is time well spent.